<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 011 - Media Hacks - The New Battle For Search - 06-08-2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediahacks.org/2009/06/011-media-hacks-the-new-battle-for-search-06-08-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediahacks.org/2009/06/011-media-hacks-the-new-battle-for-search-06-08-2009/</link>
	<description>New Thinking on New Media from More Mouths.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: July Expedition Breakfast Tries to 1up Itself &#124; Social Media Expedition</title>
		<link>http://www.mediahacks.org/2009/06/011-media-hacks-the-new-battle-for-search-06-08-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>July Expedition Breakfast Tries to 1up Itself &#124; Social Media Expedition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediahacks.org/?p=136#comment-499</guid>
		<description>[...] communities. You don&#8217;t have to take our word for it &#8211; listen to what the experts at Media Hacks have to say about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] communities. You don&#8217;t have to take our word for it &#8211; listen to what the experts at Media Hacks have to say about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt Searles</title>
		<link>http://www.mediahacks.org/2009/06/011-media-hacks-the-new-battle-for-search-06-08-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>matt Searles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediahacks.org/?p=136#comment-497</guid>
		<description>guess no one's commenting over here? It's like a ghost site!

Well.. I knew about the no follow thing.. though not about the no follow for SEO in how Chris Penn was talking about it, more like.. if you had a bad brand experience and didn't want to give that Brand SEO in your story about your bad experience.. that's when I'd use the no follow.. Although.. "such and such company's sucks" is a nice SEO to give such a company if you're feeling particularly scorned?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guess no one&#8217;s commenting over here? It&#8217;s like a ghost site!</p>
<p>Well.. I knew about the no follow thing.. though not about the no follow for SEO in how Chris Penn was talking about it, more like.. if you had a bad brand experience and didn&#8217;t want to give that Brand SEO in your story about your bad experience.. that&#8217;s when I&#8217;d use the no follow.. Although.. &#8220;such and such company&#8217;s sucks&#8221; is a nice SEO to give such a company if you&#8217;re feeling particularly scorned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

